Most “video marketing trends for 2026” miss what’s actually changing inside high-performing B2B finance and insurance marketing teams.
They tend to stay at the surface level. AI. Short-form. Personalization. All true. But if you’re sitting inside a finance or insurance marketing team, those ideas don’t really help you make better decisions.
What actually matters is how high-performing marketing teams are operationalizing video.
The real shift isn’t about formats, it’s about how video fits into the system.
Across the enterprise teams we work with, the goal is pretty consistent:
- Stay visible in long buying cycles
- Build trust in regulated environments
- Reduce friction across complex products and onboarding
And the way video supports that has changed quite a bit.
What follows is a breakdown of the five shifts we’re seeing in 2026, and how they’re being used in practice.
The Shift From Campaigns to Content Rhythms
For a long time, video in enterprise environments was tied to campaigns.
You’d invest in a brand film, a product launch, maybe one or two major pieces a year. Then you’d hope that momentum carried forward.
That model is starting to fall apart.
Sure, campaigns still matter, but they leave long gaps in between. And in those gaps, your audience is still forming opinions about your brand, your product(s), and your competitors.
High-performing teams have moved toward something more consistent. A content rhythm.
Instead of relying on one-off projects, they’re building systems that allow them to show up weekly with relevant content. The biggest unlock here has been batch recording. Rather than trying to coordinate production constantly, teams block time once per quarter. They bring in subject matter experts, capture multiple topics in one session, and break that into a series of short-form and mid-length assets (pro tip: in-person events are great opportunities for batch recording sessions).
One session can turn into months of content.
What this does is simple. It keeps your experts visible, and it builds familiarity over time. In a space where trust is everything, consistency matters more than a single polished piece.
Interactive Video Journeys
Almost all video is built as a linear experience. It's the way it's always been. You press play, and everyone watches the same thing.
The issue is that not everyone is looking for the same answer.
That’s where interactive video is starting to take hold, especially in onboarding, education, and product explanation. Instead of forcing a single narrative, teams are building “choose your own path” experiences.
A viewer can decide:
- What they want to learn
- How deep they want to go
- Which scenario applies to them
This is showing up in a few key areas:
- Customer onboarding flows
- Claims or policy walkthroughs
- Investment education
- Advisor enablement
What’s interesting is the impact this has on both engagement and operations.
Completion rates go up because the content stays relevant. At the same time, support teams see fewer repetitive questions because people can find answers on their own. And you, as the marketer, get a ton of analytical data about how your ICP interacts with the content through their journey.
It’s not just a better experience. It reduces internal load and provides valuable insights for your team.
Multilingual AI Avatars
Localization has always been a constraint.
For teams that have needed to communicate across multiple regions or languages, timelines have stretched, and costs have multiplied quickly.
With AI, that's changing.
Teams are now using AI avatars to scale a single message across multiple markets. And the technology is getting better and better every day.
The approach is straightforward:
- Create one core, compliance-approved script
- Produce a master version
- Use AI to generate localized versions across languages
The key benefit here isn’t just speed. It’s consistency.
You maintain control over messaging, tone, and compliance, while still reaching a broader audience.
For global finance and insurance organizations, this removes one of the biggest bottlenecks in video production.
Instead of choosing where to prioritize, you can actually support multiple regions at once in a timely and cost-effective manner.
Connected TV (CTV)
Most B2B video still lives on small screens (LinkedIn feeds, mobile devices, websites, etc.)
But there’s a shift happening in where high-stakes messaging is being delivered.
Connected TV (CTV) is becoming a meaningful channel for enterprise brands.
Before going further, it’s worth quickly clarifying terminology, because this gets mixed up a lot in CTV conversations.
- CTV (Connected TV) refers to the device itself. Like a smart TV, streaming device, or gaming console. Basically, anything that lets you stream content on a television.
- OTT (Over-The-Top) refers to the content delivery method. Think platforms like YouTube, Netflix, or Roku.
So when you open Netflix on your smart TV or through a Fire Stick, you’re watching OTT-delivered content through a CTV device.
For marketing teams, CTV is the more relevant part, because it’s the environment your audience is sitting in. And that environment changes how your message is received.
What makes CTV interesting in a B2B context is the combination of:
- The attention and authority of a large screen
- The targeting capabilities of digital
- The ability to connect directly to action (via QR codes or follow-up experiences)
For finance and insurance, this matters more than it might in other industries.
When the message is complex or when the decision carries weight, the environment you present it in changes how it lands. CTV creates a setting where the message can actually be absorbed, not just scrolled past.
Face-Led Strategy (Why SMEs Outperform Brands)
This is probably the most important shift, and it’s the one that gets missed the most.
In regulated industries, there’s a natural tendency to lean on the brand.
But in practice, audiences no longer build trust with logos; they build trust with people. That’s why more teams are putting their subject matter experts on camera.
This shows up in things like market updates, regulatory breakdowns, product education, and advisor communication. Content that benefits from clarity and credibility more than polish.
That said, this is also where most teams run into friction.
Getting experts on camera consistently is harder than it sounds. Schedules are tight, priorities shift, and not everyone is comfortable being recorded. Even when you do capture something valuable, there’s often a second layer of complexity around compliance review.
What someone says in a conversation doesn’t always translate cleanly into something that can be approved and distributed.
We’ve seen teams stall here. And this is where the process matters.
The teams that make this work tend to build structure around it:
- Script first, then film
For anything that needs to move quickly, scripting upfront and getting it approved by compliance before filming removes a lot of downstream risk. - Parallel workflows in post
Prioritizing rough “wireframe” edits early allows teams to send content for compliance review while the editor continues polishing. That overlap saves days, sometimes weeks. - The right on-camera talent
Not every SME needs to be on camera. Teams tend to lean on individuals who are comfortable, media-trained, and able to read from a script while still sounding natural. - Clear guardrails and repeatable workflows
Defined boundaries on messaging, lightweight scripting frameworks, and a review process that fits within compliance rather than fighting against it. - A consistent recording rhythm
Usually tied to quarterly sessions or key updates, so content doesn’t rely on one-off effort. This is often supported by repeatable graphics packages (like .MGRT templates) that keep everything visually consistent and reduce turnaround time in post.
Building a video-first system
Each of these shifts on its own can move things forward, but the real impact comes when they’re connected.
What we’re seeing across high-performing B2B teams in 2026 is a move away from treating video as a series of isolated projects, and toward building a system that supports ongoing communication.
That system usually includes a few consistent elements. A reliable content rhythm. A mix of formats depending on the use case. Production workflows that are designed to scale, not stall. Distribution that reflects where the audience actually spends time. And a clear emphasis on expert-led content.
When those pieces are aligned, video starts to function less like a campaign asset and more like part of the infrastructure behind how a brand shows up.
In finance and insurance, where buying cycles are longer and trust builds gradually, that consistency tends to outperform intensity.
And over time, that’s what creates a real advantage.
👇 Watch the Full Video
Video Chapters
00:00 – Most 2026 video trends miss the real shift
01:26 – The shift from campaigns to content rhythms
01:54 – Scaling content with batch recording
02:57 – Interactive video journeys
04:37 – AI avatars
05:39 – Connected TV (CTV) as a distribution channel
06:33 – Face-led strategy
07:16 – Building a video-first system
B2B Video Benchmark Assessment
If you’re looking at these shifts and wondering how your current video strategy stacks up, it’s worth stepping back and evaluating the system behind how your team plans, produces, and distributes video today.
Our 3-Minute Video Benchmark Assessment provides:
- A video maturity score across strategy, production, and distribution
- Insight into how your approach compares within enterprise B2B environments
- A tailored plan outlining your most immediate growth opportunities
You can access it here:
https://b2b-video-benchmark-assessment.scoreapp.com/
Full video transcript (click here to expand)
Most video trend lists for 2026 talk about AI and short-form. They’re not wrong, but they're missing the specific shifts high-performing finance and insurance enterprises are using to solve their two biggest marketing problems: scaling trust and reducing the friction of operational complexity.
We often get asked: "What are other companies actually doing with video? Where are they putting it?" Historically, the answer was "big campaigns"—the hero film or product launch once or twice a year. You launch it, then hope the momentum lasts for six months.
But with LinkedIn video uploads surging 45% year-over-year, the "campaign-only" strategy is now a liability that leaves you invisible between launches. The reality is that the smartest teams have moved past one-offs and are deploying a specific set of strategies: from always-on "content rhythms" and interactive onboarding journeys to multilingual AI scaling and a shift toward human-centric thought leadership. If you aren't visible every week, you're effectively invisible—and in finance, invisibility is a trust killer.
At Oak + Rumble we’ve spent the last 12 years inside the rooms where these video strategy decisions are made—from six-figure video campaigns to building ongoing content plans for regulated environments. We’ve seen exactly how these specific strategies are being used to reduce support friction, build advisor trust and authority, and provide the tactical support needed to help close high-stakes, multimillion-dollar enterprise deals.
Today, I’m breaking down the 2026 video playbook: five strategic shifts that your competitors are already using to outpace the market and ensure they aren't getting left behind.
To understand how high-performing teams are outperforming the market, you have to look at the transition from "Campaigns" to "Content Rhythms." These days, visibility isn't a one-off event, it’s an operating rhythm.
The biggest hurdle to this is usually the perceived effort. Most teams think "ongoing" means a constant production cycle with the headache of scheduling recording sessions with leadership and getting a bunch of people in one place at one time. But theres an easy solution to this. Batch recording. High performing teams are scheduling one large recording session every quarter (sometimes via an event or team meeting days) and they record dozens of short-form clips in one go. For example, we see teams take a major regulatory shift or a quarterly market outlook and have a Subject Matter Expert break it down into five 60-second short form clips. They aren't just reading the policy; the SME is explaining exactly what the change means for the end client. One recording session fuels months of high-authority content that keeps advisors top-of-mind and builds that essential bridge of trust.
This allows you to scale your expert's time while maintaining a consistent presence. You move from relying on sporadic, isolated campaigns to becoming a reliable source of truth in a feed that is growing by 45% every year. It’s about being indispensable, not just loud.
But even with a perfect rhythm of content, you’re still limited by the "linear" nature of video. If you’re forcing every viewer to watch the same explanation, you’re likely losing half of them before they get the answer they actually came for.
This is why the smartest teams are moving toward Interactive Video Journeys. In 2026, the "one-size-fits-all" explainer is being replaced by a "Choose Your Own Adventure" model that gives the viewer agency over the path they take.
Historically, this required custom coding, but now teams are using no-code interactive platforms like Mindstamp, Tolstoy, or VideoAsk to build these paths in minutes. Think about the friction of a new customer onboarding. Instead of a generic welcome, they receive an interactive experience where they click: "Show me how to set up my account" or "Explain my investment risk." In insurance, this could be a claims walkthrough where the user selects only the policy type relevant to them.
This creates a massive lift in completion rates (often hitting 90% and above) because the content remains 100% relevant. More importantly, it proactively deflects support tickets, reducing the need for customer calls by up to 60%.
Now, providing that level of personalized interactivity sounds expensive—and before AI, it was. But if you’re still thinking about production in terms of cameras and actors, you’re missing the efficiency leap that’s allowing your competitors to scale across global markets for a fraction of the cost. This next shift solves the localization bottleneck.
If you’re listening to all of this and wondering how your video program actually compares to other businesses in finance and insurance, we’ve built a tool to give you the clarity most teams never get. It’s our Video Benchmark Assessment. It takes about three minutes and gives you your official B2B Video Benchmark score, a breakdown of where you’re ahead or falling behind your industry, and immediate guidance to strengthen your strategy. Plus, you’ll get instant access to The Video Investment Guide to help you stop guessing your budget. There’s a link in the description to get your score now. Okay, back to the shifts...
High-performing teams are now leveraging Multilingual AI Scaling to solve the localization bottleneck. In 2026, you often need to communicate the same complex update across different regions and languages simultaneously.
Traditionally, this meant hiring five different actors, or translation experts, causing months of delays. Now, teams use AI avatars to take one core, compliance-approved script and generate high-fidelity, multilingual versions in minutes.
This allows you to maintain total control over the brand voice and regulatory accuracy while scaling your reach. It’s about taking a single production investment and multiplying its impact across your entire global footprint without a 6-month production cycle. Tools like "HeyGen" help you do this.
But scaling your message is only half the battle. If you’re only appearing on a six-inch mobile screen, you’re competing with the infinite scroll and the constant noise of the social feed. The real differentiator in 2026 is moving your message back to where it commands the most authority: the living room.
The vast majority of professional audiences have now moved away from traditional broadcast and cable, and have migrated towards streaming platforms like YouTube and Roku on the big screen. For finance brands, Connected TV is the ultimate hedge against paid ad social media clutter.
Unlike linear TV, CTV allows for precision targeting. You can reach specific households based on job titles, or even narrow your audience down by household income and investment behaviour. And in your ads you can include dynamic QR codes that take them directly to a localized landing page.
This bridges the gap between the "prestige" of TV and the "performance" of digital, delivering a 95% completion rate for your high-stakes messages.
However, none of these tools, not CTV, not AI, not interactivity, will work if you make the #1 mistake we see in 2026. Because at the end of the day, people don't buy from a "technology stack."
The reality is that Faces are outperforming logos. We've been saying this for a while now, audiences don’t trust "the brand", they trust the person who has to stand behind the explanation.
In high-risk sectors like finance, a corporate logo can feel like a shield to hide behind. But a face signals accountability. This is why the most successful teams are putting their actual subject matter experts on camera to deliver leadership content directly to LinkedIn.
People are biologically wired to recognize faces and the emotions they express to signal threat or opportunity. By centering your strategy around people, you aren't just "making content", you're building a trust-architecture that makes your brand feel human and accountable.
The shift to a video-first architecture in 2026 isn't about chasing the newest AI gimmick. It’s about building a system that allows you to show up consistently, interact intelligently, and lead with a human face.
If you can move from disconnected, one-off projects and begin to implement these five strategic pillars, you won't just be "keeping up", you’ll be the one setting the pace for everyone else.
Now, we’ve covered the strategic "where" and "how" of the 2026 playbook. But for most enterprise teams, the plan hits a wall as soon as it’s time to secure the budget. You know the visibility is worth it, but justifying the cost to your CMO or the executive committee is nearly impossible when you don't have a clear benchmark for what different types of video should actually cost. To solve that, you should watch our next video, where we pull back the curtain on enterprise video budgeting. We’ll break down the different video types and the specific "budget buckets" they fall into, so you can stop guessing and start getting the internal buy-in you need for your next project.
Ready to rumble?
For over 10 years, we’ve helped B2B marketing teams create standout content, without the stress. Our video projects typically range from $15K to $100K+, so it’s worth choosing a partner who knows how to make that investment in your brand count. If you're looking for a creative video team who gets it, let’s talk.



